• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Medical Malpractice Litigation

Medical malpractice lawsuits can be complicated and time-consuming. Both plaintiffs and defendants are also obliged to pay a significant price.

In order to obtain financial compensation in a medical malpractice lawsuit, an injured patient must prove that inadequate medical treatment caused injury. This requires establishing four components of law: a professional obligation breach of this duty, injury and damages.

Discovery

The most important aspect of a case involving medical negligence is the gathering of evidence. This can be accomplished via written interrogatories, or requests for documents. Interrogatories are inquiries that have to be answered under swearing by the opponent to the lawsuit and are used to establish facts to be presented in court. Demands for the production of documents permit tangible documents to be obtained, such as medical records or test results.

In many cases your attorney will record the deposition of a defendant physician that is an recorded session of questions and answers. This allows your attorney to ask the witness or doctor questions that might not have been permitted during trial. It can be extremely beneficial in cases that involve expert witnesses.

The information gathered during pre-trial discovery is used at trial to prove the following elements of your claim:

Infraction to the standard of care

Injuries resulting from the violation of the standard of care

Proximate cause

A doctor's inability to use the degree of expertise and knowledge held by physicians in their field of specialization, and which proximately resulted in injury to the patient

Mediation

Medical malpractice trials are important, but they also come with numerous disadvantages. For plaintiffs who are facing a lawsuit, the stress, expense, and the time commitment associated with a trial can result in a negative psychological impact on them. A trial can result in humiliation and diminished prestige for defendant health care professionals. It can also cause adverse effects on their career and practice since the financial settlements made as part of a pretrial settlement are typically reported to national practitioner databanks as well as state medical licensing boards, and medical societies.

Mediation is the most cost-effective and time-efficient and risk-free method of settling the issue of medical malpractice. Parties can negotiate more freely when they avoid the costs of a trial and the potential for the verdicts of juries to be undermined.

Each side must submit a brief description of the situation for the mediator prior to mediation (a "mediation short"). In this stage, parties will usually communicate through their lawyer, not directly with one another. Direct communication can be used as evidence in court. As the mediation continues, it is recommended to focus on the strengths of your case, and be prepared to acknowledge its weaknesses as well. This will assist the mediator to solve any gaps in understanding and offer you reasonable offers.

Trial

The goal of reformers working on torts is to develop a system to compensate those who have been injured by medical negligence in a timely manner and without excessive cost. Many states have implemented tort-reform measures to reduce costs and prevent frivolous claims for medical malpractice.

The majority of physicians in the United States have malpractice insurance as a way of safeguarding themselves from allegations of professional negligence. Some of these policies are required as a condition for hospital privileges or work with a medical organization.

In order to obtain monetary compensation for injuries caused by negligence of a medical professional, an injured patient must prove that the doctor didn't meet the standards of care applicable in the field of expertise they practice. This concept is called proximate causation and it is a key element in a medical malpractice case.

A lawsuit starts when an order for civil summons is filed in the court of your choice. After this the parties must participate in a process of disclosure. This involves written interrogatories and the production of documents, such as medical records. Depositions (in which attorneys challenge deponents under an oath), and requests for admission are also involved.

In a claim for medical malpractice the burden of proof is very high. Damages are determined based on economic losses (such as lost income or the costs of a future medical procedure) and non-economic damages such as pain and discomfort. In the event of pursuing a claim based on medical malpractice, it's important to hire a skilled attorney.

Settlement

Settlements are the most popular method of settling medical malpractice lawsuits. In general, the actual dollar value of a case is negotiated between the plaintiff and the defendants (often through or alongside the defendant's malpractice/professional liability insurer). The injured patient receives a check, which is paid to the plaintiff's lawyer who then deposits it into an account for escrow. The lawyer then deducts the case expenses and legal fees per the representation agreement, and the injured patient receives compensation.

To win a medical malpractice lawsuit, a patient must show that a physician or other healthcare provider violated their duty of care by failing to show the required level of knowledge and expertise in their field. They must also prove that the victim suffered harm due to the breach.

In the United States, there are 94 federal district courts that are comparable to state trial courts. Each of these courts has an ad-hoc jury and judge panel which hears cases. In certain situations, a medical malpractice case may be transferred to one of these courts. Physicians in the United States typically carry medical malpractice insurance to safeguard themselves against claims of unintentional harm or wrongdoing. Medical professionals should be aware of the nature and workings of our legal system so that they can react in a timely manner to claims made against them.