• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Pornhub has started accepting cryptocurrency as a fee choice, the corporate announced right this moment. The site now accepts Verge cryptocurrency (no relation to The Verge), a rebranded model of Dogecoindark, which split off from the unique meme coin, Dogecoin, in 2014. Now, users pays for any Pornhub features, together with a Premium subscription, utilizing Verge cryptocurrency. Pornhub’s grownup sister sites, Brazzers and Nutaku, also accept Verge cryptocurrency now. Verge cryptocurrency is anonymity-targeted, which is why Pornhub executives say they selected it over different potential companions. It ought to be noted that anyone can view Verge cryptocurrency transactions by its public ledger, but it uses the anonymity device Tor and an nameless network layer I2P to cover particular transactions’ IP addresses and places. Since public ledgers typically have their downfalls in protecting anonymity, customers also choose to hide on Verge cryptocurrency’s private ledger. Corey Price, VP at Pornhub, tells The Verge that cryptocurrency provides "convenience and safety." It’s a dubious assertion, contemplating most digital coins have excessive transaction fees and unstable costs that could be a hassle for users. Companies like Valve and Stripe have ended their cryptocurrency help for these very causes. Stripe has even gone as far as including cryptocurrency to its prohibited companies checklist. Verge cryptocurrency has been pretty risky, like other in style digital coins. 0.22 per coin but has since dropped back down. On the heels of this announcement as we speak, it rose to about 10 cents per coin, which remains to be low in comparison with more popular digital currencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum. "We’ve been taking a look at crypto for fairly some time," says Price, adding that Pornhub’s accomplice websites did accept limited cryptocurrencies back when Bitcoin had newly emerged as a digital foreign money. Still, Pornhub wasn’t one of many sites to include cryptocurrency as a payment methodology again then, doubtless because Bitcoin’s costs had been still low.

Inventions that had been forward of their time may also help us to grasp whether we're actually ready to live on this planet we're making. Speculative fiction fans know that you may create a whole world out of just a handful of objects. A lightsaber can begin to explain an entire galaxy far, far away; a handheld communicator, phaser, and tablet can depict a star-trekking utopia; a black monolith can stand in for an entire alien civilization. World-constructing isn’t about creating imaginary worlds from scratch - accounting for his or her every element - however hinting at them by highlighting mere sides that represent a coherent actuality beneath them. If that actuality is convincing, then the world is inhabitable by the imagination and its stories are endearing to the heart. Creating objects in the true world is sort of precisely the identical; that’s why invention is a threat. After we create something new - actually, categorically, conceptually new - we place a wager on the steadiness of assist it will have on the earth wherein it emerges and the facility it should remake that world.

When a product fails as a result of it was "ahead of its time," that often signifies that its makers succeeded at world-building, not invention. It might be argued that Jean-Louis Gassée, porn not Jony Ive, invented the pill computer, though his Newton MessagePad failed quickly after it launch in 1993 and is now principally forgotten. In hindsight, it’s easy to see why Ive’s pad succeeded where Gassée’s didn't: twenty years of technological growth offered higher hardware, screens, batteries, software program, and connectivity. And regardless that anybody fascinated by a tablet had most likely been prepared for one since even earlier than the MessagePad thanks to the Star Trek universe being stuffed with PADDs, the one factor that really ready the world for the pill computer was the mobile phone. In 1993, hardly anybody had a mobile phone. By 2010, 5 billion people used them. A world during which over 70% of its population is already accustomed to cellular computing is one prepared for a bridge device between a small cell display screen and a big stationary one.

The Newton MessagePad, of course, isn’t alone. So many products and applied sciences which might be commonplace at the moment made their debuts in products that didn’t truly succeed. Not as a result of they weren’t good concepts, but because the world wasn’t fairly prepared they usually weren’t highly effective enough to make it so. The Nintendo Power Glove anticipated gestural interfaces and controls virtually 15 years earlier than Minority Report informed us all to expect them… ’re still not there. Microsoft’s Zune wasn’t the primary portable MP3 participant, of course; that distinction goes to the fully unknown MPMan F10, released in 1997. It also wasn’t the primary really good or really successful one; the iPod actually should get the credit for that. But, it did danger its identity on a month-to-month subscription music service that the MP3 hoarders it was bought to only weren’t ready for. Google Glass was released in 2013 and died a humiliating however quick loss of life after a well known tech bro wore it within the shower, reminding the world that face-mounted computer systems are made for a reality much creepier than any of us want.